This document covers the issue of North Korea's policy of balancing between China and Soviet Union.
GDR Embassy to DPRK
- Political Department -
Pyongyang, 13 September 1973
I n f o r m a t i o n
About the Appraisal of the 10th CCP Party Congress in the DPRK
The wide-ranging appraisal of the 10th CCP Congress in the DPRK demonstrates how the KWP leadership is attesting major importance to the development of relations with the CCP.
Overall, the following coverage appeared in the DPRK press:
In its two congratulatory addresses the KWP leadership
Zhou Enlai’s speech at the Congress is published almost in full. A comparison shows that the Koreans removed or revised almost anything containing direct attacks against the Soviet Union (see juxtapositions in attachment [not translated]). The Soviet Union is directly mentioned only in the passage referring to Lin Biao’s flight towards the USSR, yet this is also watered down compared to the original. Furthermore, there is one reference to “nuclear superpowers,” and another one on “superpowers.” Yet the naming of those countries [USSR and USA] in Zhou Enlai’s original speech is omitted.
In relation to press coverage regarding the 24th CPSU Party Congress, the reporting on the 10th CCP Party Congress is more extensive in both content and scope.
With these published assessments, the KWP negates the open anti-Soviet course of the 10th CCP Party Congress, the contradictions and infighting within the CCP leadership, the domestic situation and the foreign policy of the PRC.
The wide coverage of the 10th Party Congress can be considered as a kind of “honorarium” from the Koreans in response to comprehensive Chinese support for DPRK policies. Yet despite this extensive praise for the 10th Party Congress, it is apparent that the DPRK is not willing to openly follow the PRC in its anti-Soviet course. There is evidence for this:
Helga Merten
3rd Secretary
CC:
1x Central Committee/Department IV
1x Foreign Ministry/Far East
1x Embassy/Political Department
About North Korea's attempt to develop relations with China, but still within the range of polity of balance.
The History and Public Policy Program welcomes reuse of Digital Archive materials for research and educational purposes. Some documents may be subject to copyright, which is retained by the rights holders in accordance with US and international copyright laws. When possible, rights holders have been contacted for permission to reproduce their materials.
To enquire about this document's rights status or request permission for commercial use, please contact the History and Public Policy Program at HAPP@wilsoncenter.org.