On this second day of the talks, international affairs were the main topic of conversation. From the Soviet record, which like those of the first and the next discussion, was made by Fedorenko and the third secretary of the USSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs Anatolii I. Filyov, it is evident that the atmosphere was fully relaxed, anti-imperialism brought the communist leaders together. Both hated America, Great Britain, France, West Germany, Japan, and their leaders. They discussed the situation in the Near East in detail and were heartened by the victory of leftist forces in Iraq. They joked a lot. And only at the end did Mao lightly touch upon his claims to Khrushchev, who at once reminded the Chinese leader of the Soviet advisors. It was obvious that this question continued to bother him, and Khrushchev exacerbated his grievance.

At the airport in Beijing, Mao and Khrushchev agree on how to organize their meetings over the next several days.

An analytical report written by internal analysts from the Romanian Foreign Ministry, M. Cristian and I. Nitescu, in 22 March 1948 to estimate the evolution and impact of the Marshall Plan.

A 25-page report sent by the Romanian Ambassador in Moscow, Iorgu Iordan, regarding Soviet perceptions of the Marshall Plan and a synthesis of life in Soviet Union as reflected in the media.

Telegram no. 964 sent by the Romanian Ambassador in Oslo, on 8 July, 1947, regarding the concerns of Norwegian politicians who believed that Marshall Plan would influence Norwegian sovereignty.

Telegram no. 381 from 17 July, sent by the Charge d’ affairs Totescu from the Romanian Legation in Portugal, explaining the reasons why Portugal accepted the ERP 

Telegram no.475 from 30 July sent by the Romanian Ambassador in Sofia, explaining the refusal of Marshall Plan by Bulgaria 

Letter signed by Minister Tatarescu on July 12 in response to Roy M. Melbourne, the US Representative of Legation, who sent to the Romanian Government a Note of Protest on 24 June, 1947, regarding deprivation of civil liberties, arbitrary arrests and detention of hundreds of opposition parties.

Letter of Foreign Minister Tatarescu sent on July 9 in response to the British and French letters of invitation, declining the participation to the ERP conference in Paris from July 12 

A message from the British Representative, Adrian Holman, addressed on July 7 to Minister Tatarescu as “personal and confidential." In five points, Holman essentially offer a rebuttal of Soviet criticisms to Marshall Plan.