N O T E
on the conversation between Ambassador Zvonko Grahek and Prime Minister Fidel Castro at a dinner at Minister Roa’s, April 26, 1960.
The conversation lasted 6 hours.
I conveyed the greetings of Comrade President to Castro.
He received it cordially, but he did not ask that I also convey my greetings.
After greetings, I handed him the NOB [People Liberation Struggle] Atlas in Spanish. He was immediately interested, examining it in detail. NOB became the topic of conversation for about an hour, during which he took a detailed interest in the method of organizing the uprising, the way of warfare, in which regions the uprising was most intense, etc.
Looking at pictures of the stay of the Cuban delegation at the SSRNJ [Socialist Alliance of Working People of Yugoslavia] Congress, Castro became interested in its character and program. On that occasion, Che Guevara mentioned that they received a very interesting report from the delegation. However, he did not say anything about the content. He only says that when the name of Fidel was mentioned, there was a real ovation.
He was interested in our relations with the church. They feel that there will be difficulties. They take great care not to give rise to any disagreements. (Note: they have the same principled attitude towards the church as we do).
To my question, he replied that they were expecting some form of invasion with possible US assistance. They arrive at such estimates deductively. An economic blockade cannot be effective, because they managed to break into the non-American market. Internal blasting by the fifth column, which cannot be organized, cannot be effective. A similar intervention as in Guatemala in 1954 cannot be applied in the Cuban case. Since the USA is not ready to accept the revolution as a fait accompli, and each of the mentioned measures separately and all taken together cannot threaten it, they are expecting and preparing for some kind of invasion.
(p. 1)
The USA made gross political mistakes concerning Cuba, which they managed to make good use of. However, lately, there has been a change in political action. After the explosion of the ship with weapons, no more airplanes flying over, "friendly" gestures were made, the US ambassador appeared at various events, toured Cuba, often visited the MFA, etc. Direct anti-Cuban action moved from the US to other LA countries. The main line of US political action is now on the formation of a fifth column in Cuba. On the other hand, an attempt is being made to isolate Cuba from other LA countries on an anti-communist platform to prepare the ground for action against Cuba through the application of inter-American treaties.
And the US is taking advantage of their mistakes. For example, in one statement on television, he ranted and said that Cuba does not recognize those inter-American treaties that it did not sign. They largely exploited this, although an official denial was subsequently given.
However, their plans are confused by some unexpected events. He mentioned the Congress for Freedom and Democracy, which was convened in Venezuela to condemn Castro's extremism, and passed resolutions supporting the Cuban revolution. On that occasion, Roa noticed that they had sent their men there who won it. He was also invited but, of course, he refused. He also assessed the events in Korea and Turkey as favorable for the Cuban situation.
He says that they are preparing as if an invasion will follow immediately. They are training troops in the Sierra Maestra for guerrilla warfare, they have organized a militia and are rapidly training it. The most important thing is that at the same time, by popular standards, they are increasingly binding the people to themselves (Note: Especially in the province of Oriente, they are building schools, hospitals, apartments, a large school town for 20,000 pupils and students, etc. as if they estimate that this insurgent province will also in case new difficulties to be the main stronghold).
[...] Then, to my interest,
(p. 2)
he explained in detail the character of their agrarian reform. He says that they acted very cautiously, they gradually specified their intentions. That is why, for example, the latifundistas supported them and everyone interpreted their general slogan of agrarian reform in their own way. The first law from that area, back in the Sierra Maestra, only said that all those peasants who in various forms of lease hold properties of less than 5 caballeria (1 caballeria = 13.46 hectares) automatically become owners of that property. With this, they strengthened the support of the peasants, and the question of the agrarian maximum remained open. After coming to power, the Law on Agrarian Reform was prepared. No one was against it in principle. Despite the resistance, they managed to accept the agrarian maximum of 30 cavalry.
In particular, he pointed out that their practice is more radical than the law, contrary to expectations based on similar experiences. Cooperatives are the basis of their reform. Although they proclaimed the distribution of land to the peasants, they did not break up the latifundia. Only in legalizing the existing state of fragmentation of some large estates on which peasants worked in various forms of lease. He underlined that they did not thereby create a small private property, but only gave the right of ownership over plots of 5 cavalry to those peasants who otherwise already cultivated those plots but were not the owners. Otherwise, they turned the latifundia, which were cultivated by agricultural workers, into cooperatives.
Regarding the various objections that their revolution takes place without ideological conceptions, he explains that their slogan is: "The revolution is built step by step on concrete works, not on theoretical discussions." This is not because the leadership does not have a clear perspective, but because such discussions can only harm them politically today. Their main slogan is the unity of the People, and theoretical discussions in today's situation would be politically reduced to the question of being for or against communism. In doing so, one should bear in mind the historical development of the situation in Cuba, which is similar throughout Latin America. Namely, for years a very strong anti-communist campaign was developed here using all possible means, which left a deep mark on the people. He vividly explained it in the following way: If the average Cuban is asked if he is in favor of agrarian reform,
(p. 3)
he will answer positively; will also answer positively to the question of whether he is in favor of all other socio-economic reforms. However, if he is asked if he is in favor of communism, he will answer just as firmly - no. Therefore, such a mental state has been created in people that can only be changed by gradual, concrete actions. Thus, in parallel with the development of the Revolution, there is a revision of concepts. Today, people are already starting to ask themselves: if this is communism - how hard is the anti-Cuban campaign - then that communism is not bad, it is acceptable for us. People start to think about the truth of everything that was served to them before. However, this process of mental transformation of people will take a long time.
When Guevara was asked how he managed to save 70 million dollars in 4 months, Fidel replied wittily - "Look around the shops and you will find the answer. If you ask if there is butter and other things, they will answer that there is none". All their economic policy measures are anti-inflationary.
To my question about when we can expect his meeting with the President, Castro says that he should go to the UAR [United Arab Republic], Yugoslavia, and the USSR. He wants it to be in the summer of this year. However, the situation here is such that he must speak to the people every 15-20 days. That would be the maximum time limit for visiting the mentioned countries. Roa brought in Great Britain. He wants to see the places where the fighting took place in Yugoslavia because their armed struggle in Cuba was tiny compared to the size of the NOB. The struggle of the Yugoslav people was in front of his eyes the entire time of their struggle.
He accepted with interest the discussion about the need for his greater involvement in world affairs. He admits that his speeches are almost completely dominated by the issue of Cuba and its relations with the USA and LA [Latin America]. He notes that he spoke about Algeria several times and that during his visit to Mikoyan, he also spoke about broader issues of international politics. It must not be rushed, they must take into account Cuba's membership in the Inter-American Organization. But, he underlines, he will certainly gradually pay more attention to those problems. With the support of Ro, the possibility of statements in this sense was raised during the visit of Sukarno. From the point of view of that broader international affirmation of Cuba, it was discussed about the need for Castro to visit the countries to which he has already announced a visit to others.
(p. 4)
He was interested in the other President. He has great respect for him. I proposed to him a written contact, which he received upon approval.
Castro asked when the Comrade President intends to visit Cuba. I said that he would like to connect the visit to Cuba with a visit to some other Latin American countries. To his question whether there are already any official invitations, I answered that there are none yet. He then started talking about Venezuela and Brazil. From the beginning, they don't get the kind of support that could be expected. They gave unreserved help to Betancourt during the recent attempted military coup, including a proposal for military aid, but he not only did not take it, he did not even respond. A few days ago, he sent a letter to Dorticos in which he took a negative stance towards Venezuela's participation in the conference of underdeveloped countries. On that occasion, he used the term: marionette for Betancourt. He spoke very negatively about the government of Brazil. In other words, he indirectly expressed his doubt that LA will invite other governments, that is, he expressed his fear that in the absence of other invitations and visits to Cuba, it would not be called into question.
Belgrade, May 18, 1960